Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 23:54
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Thank you.
The mystery rise of lung cancer in non-smokers - BBC
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Yes, You Can Change Outfits In Nightreign , But Not At First - Kotaku
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
You May Want To Think Twice Before You Eat Bagged Lettuce - HuffPost
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Totam aut neque cum voluptas velit eum tempore.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Intel Stock (NASDAQ:INTC) Blasts Up as Mac Support Dies - TipRanks
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What are some common medications prescribed for anxiety while traveling?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
There’s another leak on the ISS, but NASA is not saying much about it - Ars Technica